Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lane v. O' Malley
as 6:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Sondra Lee Lane
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lane v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lane
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lane v. Kijakazi et al
as 6:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
John C. Lane
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Joy Lane Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lane v. Saul
as 6:2020cv00084
Plaintiff:
James Lane
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Not Classified By Court:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lane v. Saul
as 6:2019cv00102
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Sondra Lee Lane
Not Yet Classified:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Holden v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv02025
Plaintiff:
Daryl Lane Holden
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lane v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv01148
Plaintiff:
Nickeisha Stacy Lane
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lane v. Colvin
as 6:2014cv00123
Plaintiff:
Sondra Lee Lane
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lane v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv02514
Plaintiff:
Ethel Wilson Lane
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
