Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Jimenez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv01101
Plaintiff:
Aiesha Smith and Esha Ray Jimenez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Payne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv01551
Plaintiff:
Tanner Ray Payne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pagan v. Mrs. Galarza et al
as 1:2023cv05599
Plaintiff:
Ray A. Pagan
Defendant:
Mrs. Galarza, Ms. Stuart and Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mitchell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00665
Plaintiff:
Khristian Mitchell and Khristian Ray Shawn Georg Mitchell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ray v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Bobby L. Ray
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bartoli v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv01945
Plaintiff:
Sheilda Rai Neil Bartoli and Sheilda Rai Neil Bertoli
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ray-Tompkins v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv01008
Plaintiff:
Kellene Ann Ray-Tompkins
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Farrow v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06130
Plaintiff:
Ra-Sha Perry Ray Farrow
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and SSA-Regional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bradley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv06732
Plaintiff:
Ray Bradley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ray v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ray
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
