Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Romero v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
Leroy Romero
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Romero v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Carmen Florence Romero
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Romero v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Enlund Romero
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Romero v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Paul Mathew Romero
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Romero v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Christine Audry Romero
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Romero v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Romero
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Romero v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Leroy Romero
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Romero v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv00602
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Francine Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Romero v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv00249
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Paul Mathew Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Romero v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv00282
Plaintiff:
Mario Romero
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.