Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Bocock v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00804
Plaintiff:
Tammy Bocock
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Valois v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv00463
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Tammy Valois and Tammy A. Valois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bowers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv01866
Plaintiff:
Tammy Lee Bowers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parks v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00913
Plaintiff:
Tammy W. Parks
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dunlap v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv02139
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Dunlap
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harden v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv03225
Plaintiff:
Tammy S. Harden
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Deason v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv01558
Plaintiff:
Tammy Jan Deason
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hammer v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv01341
Plaintiff:
Tammy J. Hammer
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parks v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv01307
Plaintiff:
Tammy W. Parks
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Stephens v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv01162
Plaintiff:
Tammy S. Stephens
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
