Cases 211 - 220 of 523
Peter T. Papoulias Trust v. United States et al
as 1:2013cv02110
Plaintiff:
Peter T. Papoulias Trust
Defendant:
United States and IRS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ESTATE OF JAMES E POWELL et al
as 1:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ESTATE OF JAMES E POWELL, Irvin Clyde Powell, CLARK KENT POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
TALIAFERRO v. FREEMAN
as 1:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
IRVIN E TALIAFERRO
Defendant:
S FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6702 IRS: Refund of Income Tax Penalty
United States of America v. Adegbite et al
as 1:2013cv01799
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Matthew Adegbite, MAS & Associates, CPA, LLC and Mathew A. Adegbite, CPA, PC
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TREVITT et al
as 5:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BARBARA B TREVITT, CHARLES B HAYGOOD, JR, JESSIE B HAYGOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HARRIS
as 5:2013cv00157
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
ADDISON E HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Baxter v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 2:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Beverly S. Baxter
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Attorney and Internal Revenue Service
United States of America v. Duffey's Cabinet Shop, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01262
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Duffey's Cabinet Shop, Inc., Ronald Duffey and Debra Duffey
United States of America v. Davenport
as 3:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lanier Marchant Davenport
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. West Coast Servicing Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01251
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
West Coast Servicing Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., LaFarge Building Materials, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
