Cases 101 - 110 of 140
United States of America et al v. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District
as 1:2010cv02895
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of Ohio
Defendant:
Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District
Movant:
Stephen L. Merkel and Eugene P. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Tuttle v. State of Ohio Dept. of Public Safety et al
as 3:2010cv02794
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Tuttle
Defendant:
State of Ohio Dept. of Public Safety, Duke LNU and City of Cleveland Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
State of Ohio ex rel v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company et al
as 2:2010cv00981
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio ex rel
Defendant:
Cyprus Amax Minerals Company and Chemetall Foote Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Kister v. State Of Ohio
as 2:2010cv00395
Plaintiff:
Chad Kister
Defendant:
State Of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Huffman et al v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2009cv02663
Plaintiff:
Oreon J Huffman
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Blaise Thomas, Richard Ambrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02251
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lutz v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2009mc00091
Plaintiff:
Ronald Edward Lutz
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Richard M. Markus, William David Mason and others
United States of America et al v. Ineos ABS (USA) Corp et al
as 1:2009cv00545
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of OHIO ex rel
Defendant:
Ineos ABS (USA) Corp and LANXESS Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413 (b) Clean Air Act
Hill v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2009mc00029
Petitioner:
Ronald Hill
Respondent:
State of Ohio and Marisa Bell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
