Cases 101 - 110 of 26,229
Reynolds v. McGillin et al
as 2:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Laurie Reynolds
Defendant:
Judge Howard O. McGillin, Judge John M. Alexander, St. Johns County Florida Family Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02232
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lysa Daniels Tribe et al v. Mozley, Finlayson & Loggins LLP et al
as 1:2024mi00038
Plaintiff:
Lysa Daniels Tribe and Alyssa Daniels
Defendant:
Mozley, Finlayson & Loggins LLP, Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC and M&T Bank, Legal Document Processing
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Kompan A/S et al. v. Bliss Products and Services, Inc.
as 1:2024mi00039
Respondent:
Bliss Products and Services, Inc.
Petitioner:
Kompan A/S and Kompan, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
