Cases 111 - 120 of 1,234
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Schmitendorf v. Juicy's Vapor Lounge, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02293
Plaintiff:
BRADY SCHMITENDORF
Defendant:
JUICY'S VAPOR LOUNGE INC. and Juicy's Vapor Lounge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stallings v. Renzenberger, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02264
Plaintiff:
Kelon Stallings
Defendant:
Renzenberger, Inc. doing business as Hallcon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A. v. Ashtel Studios, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02249
Plaintiff:
Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A.
Defendant:
Ashtel Studios, Inc. doing business as SmartCare and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
