Cases 111 - 120 of 159
USA v. Digital Devices Seized on September 23, 2010 from 3529 Still Meadow Lane, Lancaster, CA 93536
as 2:2010mj02864
Defendant:
Digital Devices Seized on September 23, 2010 from 3529 Still Meadow Lane, Lancaster, CA 93536 (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Aramid Entertainment B.V. et al v. Bontempo Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv09078
Cross Defendant:
Thomas Adamek, Aramid Capital Partners LLP, DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Aramid Entertainment B.V., Aramid Entertainment Fund Limited and Cayman Film Holdings Limited
Defendant:
David Bergstein, Bontempo Holdings, LLC, Bontempo Productions, LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
Dandelion Holdings, LLC, Five Dollar Productions, LLC, Lavender Productions, LLC and others
Digital Devices Seized on September 23, 2010 from 3529 Still Meadow Lane, Lancaster, CA 93536
as 2:2010mj02864
Defendant:
Digital Devices Seized on September 23, 2010 from 3529 Still Meadow Lane, Lancaster, CA 93536 (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06989
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Park Lane Hand Car Wash, Inc. v. Wells Fargo, N.A. et al
as 2:2010cv06033
Plaintiff:
Park Lane Hand Car Wash, Inc.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Melanya Hovhannisyan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Alejandro Altamirano Rivapalacio
as 2:2010mj01101
Defendant:
Alejandro Altamirano Rivapalacio (1)
Unknown:
Kelley Lane Munoz
Plaintiff:
USA
USA v. Rivapalacio
as 2:2010mj01101
Defendant:
Alejandro Altamirano Rivapalacio (1)
Unknown:
Kelley Lane Munoz
Plaintiff:
USA
Abraham Gomez Sanchez
as 2:2010mj01099
Defendant:
Abraham Gomez Sanchez (1)
Unknown:
Kelley Lane Munoz
Plaintiff:
USA
USA v. Sanchez
as 2:2010mj01099
Defendant:
Abraham Gomez Sanchez (1)
Unknown:
Kelley Lane Munoz
Plaintiff:
USA
USA v. Lara
as 2:2010mj00886
Defendant:
Hugo Reyes Lara (1)
Unknown:
Kelley Lane Munoz
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
