Cases 111 - 120 of 346
Alpheus Hamilton v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-15525
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALPHEUS ELITE HAMILTON
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and DAVID SHINN, Director, ADOC
Kurzie Curtis v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-15512
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant:
KURZIE LEE CURTIS
Thomas Baumgartner v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-15489
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS BAUMGARTNER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Donnie Twiggs v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 21-70646
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner:
DONNIE ROMONE TWIGGS
Keith Allen v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-15438
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEITH EDWARD ALLEN
Emelio Osorio-Rosas v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-15300
Petitioner / Appellant:
EMELIO OSORIO-ROSAS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, ADOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Donald Mohon v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 21-15285
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONALD ALAN MOHON
Emelio Osorio-Rosas v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 21-15289
Petitioner / Appellant:
EMELIO OSORIO-ROSAS
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Emelio Osorio-Rosas v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 21-15291
Petitioner / Appellant:
EMELIO OSORIO-ROSAS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Andrew Noble v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-70333
Respondent:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner:
ANDREW MILO NOBLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
