Cases 181 - 190 of 259
Rodriguez et al v. Ilagan
as 1:2009cv00025
Plaintiff:
Dennis G. Rodriguez and Asuncion S. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Artemio B. Ilagan
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1424 The Organic Act of Guam
United States of America v. Lucky Dragon Development Co., LTD et al
as 1:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lucky Dragon Development Co., LTD, Pacmax Enterprise Corp., Legend Stone Corp., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Small Business Investment Capital, Inc.
as 1:2009mc00047
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Small Business Investment Capital, Inc.
USA v. Government of Guam
as 1:2002cv00022
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Government of Guam
Receiver:
Gershman Brickner & Bratton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Young et al
as 1:2009mc00044
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Donald Anthony Walker Young, Acorn Capitol Management, LLC, Acorn II, L.P. and others
United States of America v. New England Partners Capital, L.P.
as 1:2009mc00039
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
New England Partners Capital, L.P.
United States of America v. MESBIC Ventures, Inc.
as 1:2009mc00036
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
MESBIC Ventures, Inc.
United States of America v. Northwest Venture Partners III, LP
as 1:2009mc00037
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Northwest Venture Partners III, LP
United States of America v. Chisholm SBIC, L.P.
as 1:2009mc00034
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Chisholm SBIC, L.P.
In the Matter of the Seizure of All Funds Maintained in the Bank Accounts Listed as Follows: Bank of Hawaii, Acct No. 45029549, First Hawaiian Bank, Acct No. 02-346605, and Bank of Guam, Acct. 201610405
as 1:2009mc00031
Petitioner:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
