Cases 11 - 20 of 295
ESI, Inc. of Tennessee v. Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
ESI, Inc. of Tennessee
Defendant:
Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0003 Application to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration
Brown v. Netspend Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Netspend Corporation and Republic Bank and Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SAIA Motor Freight Line, LLC v. Brown Paper Goods Company
as 2:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
SAIA Motor Freight Line, LLC
Defendant:
Brown Paper Goods Company
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14705 Interstate Commerce Act/Carmack Amendment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sight Sciences, Inc. v. Ivantis, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03275
Plaintiff:
Sight Sciences, Inc.
Defendant:
Ivantis, Inc., Alcon Research LLC, Alcon Vision, LLC and others
Petitioner:
Dr. Reay Brown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
