Cases 11 - 20 of 1,273
MILLER et al v. BOURFF
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
CELESTE A MILLER, MILLER LEGAL, PC and MILLER LEGAL PC
Defendant:
MICHAEL J BOURFF
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Edwards v. Bucci et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Defendant:
Noelani G. Skipper, Judge Dean Bucci, Jerald David Westmorland and others
Plaintiff:
Kamiliah Edwards
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Fraley v. Unknown
as 1:2024mi00008
Plaintiff:
Vinson J. Fraley, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Actavis, Inc. et al v. King Drug Company of Florence, Inc. et al
as 1:2024mi00001
Respondent:
King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., Amerisourcebergen Drug Corp. and others
Petitioner:
Actavis, Inc., Actavis Holdco U.S., Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Griffin v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc et al
as 1:2023cv05560
Petitioner:
Nikita J. Griffin
Respondent:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Application to Vacate Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
