Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Allen et al v. IM Solutions, LLC et al
as 6:2014cv00213
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Allen , Allen & Wisner, LLC , James E. Blount, IV and others
Defendant:
IM Solutions, LLC, LeadingResponse, LLC, Reed Elsevier Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Farley v. Stacy et al
as 4:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Michael A Farley
Defendant:
Anthony R Stacy and Paul A Ross
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Terry v. Robert James & Associates Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00687
Plaintiff:
Tochia Terry
Defendant:
Robert James & Associates Inc, Robert James & Associates Asset Management Inc and Anthony Coppola
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McKinley v. United States of America
as 5:2012cv00605
Petitioner:
Joseph Anthony McKinley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Ellis v. A&N Collections LLC et al
as 5:2012cv00579
Plaintiff:
Robin Ellis
Defendant:
A&N Collections LLC, Nicholas J Alfano and Anthony R Neal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davis v. Hudson Refinery
as 5:2011cv00916
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant:
Hudson Refinery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Hudson Refinery
as 4:2011cv00465
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant:
Hudson Refinery and Payne County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevenson v. Rochford et al
as 4:2010cv00260
Plaintiff:
Thomas R Stevenson
Defendant:
Lloyd Rochford, Stanley McCabe, Clayton Woodrum and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Johnson, et al v. Tulsa, City of
as 4:1994cv00039
Plaintiff:
Roy C Johnson , Mark A Moore , Dwight E Jackson and others
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of
Intervenor_defendant:
Lodge 93 Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge #93
Pecial_master:
John A Gaberino, Jr
Claimant:
Matthew Wick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
