Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Chatman v. Tyner, et al
as 1:2003cv06636
Plaintiff:
Charles James Chatman
Defendant:
C Tyner , - Alameida, K W Prunty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jameson v. Rawers, et al., et al
as 1:2003cv05593
Plaintiff:
Barry S Jameson
Defendant:
Scott P Rawers , Edward S. Alameida, Jr. , E Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MaGee v. Bravo, et al
as 1:2003cv06764
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee
Defendant:
D Bravo, A. Scribner, E. S. Alameida, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wohl v. Davis, et al
as 1:2003cv06921
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Wohl
Defendant:
Gray Davis, Edward S. Alameida, Jr., Richard E Early and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Du Pree v. Jennie Woodford et al
as 2:2004cv03484
Defendant:
Edward Alameida, A Attagalla, R Beltran and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Du Pree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric C Jacobson v. Arnold Schwarzenegger
as 2:2004cv03629
Defendant:
Edward S Alameida Jr, Ken Cater, Carol Daly and others
Plaintiff:
Eric C Jacobson and Eric Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gary Sizemore v. Edward S. Alameida
as 09-72631
Petitioner:
GARY LEE SIZEMORE
Respondent:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr.
Willie Stewart v. Edward Alameida
as 09-71189
Petitioner:
WILLIE STEWART
Respondent:
EDWARD ALAMEIDA
Kevin W Mardis v. Edward S Alameida
as 5:2003cv00938
Respondent:
Edward S Alameida, - and Mike Evans
Petitioner:
Kevin W Mardis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley N Raville v. Edward J Alameida
as 2:2003cv00585
Respondent:
Edward J Alameida, Jr
Petitioner:
Bradley Neal Raville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
