Cases 11 - 20 of 48
The Mississippi Bar v. Williamson
as 3:2021ad00005
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Candace L. Williamson
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Walter
as 3:2021ad00004
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
William C. Walter
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Miller
as 3:2021ad00003
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Jonathan Adam Miller
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Perkins
as 3:2021ad00002
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Martin D. Perkins
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Bennett
as 3:2021ad00001
Respondent:
Christina Huffman Bennett
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Alexander v. General Revenue Corporation
as 3:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
Alvia Alexander
Defendant:
General Revenue Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
The Mississippi Bar v. Jones
as 3:2020ad00009
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Angela L. Jones
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Knight
as 3:2020ad00008
Respondent:
Jeffrey Dixon Knight
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. King
as 3:2020ad00007
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Ralph P. King, II
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Johnson
as 3:2020ad00006
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Richard Vaughn Johnson, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
