Cases 11 - 20 of 28
PCS Sales (USA), Inc. et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 1:2019cv06505
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Plaintiff:
PCS Sales (USA), Inc., Agrium (U.S.), Inc., White Springs Agricultural Chemicals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Burns v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02592
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc
Plaintiff:
Siobhan Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2017cv07383
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kevin Walsh
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2017cv07387
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kevin Walsh and CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Best Choice Service, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01967
Defendant:
Best Choice Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Auburn Thirty Six, LLC, et al et al
as 3:2014mc00079
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
Auburn Thirty Six, LLC, et al and Michael Goldstein
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Bulldog Transportation, Inc.
as 1:2014cv07523
Defendant:
Bulldog Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gouge v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01140
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Gouge, Jr.
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Archer Daniels Midland Company v. CSX Transportation Inc
as 2:2011cv02212
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. TMR Company, Inc.
as 1:2011cv05668
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
TMR Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
