Other Statutes Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00020
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00268
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04048
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03902
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Khan El v. Corbat et al
as 1:2014cv03527
Plaintiff: Mustafa Shakur Khan El
Defendant: Michael L. Corbat , Citigroup, Inc. , Jane Frazer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00968
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hand v. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00176
Plaintiff: Richard Hand
Defendant: ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. , LaSalle Bank, N.A. , Cenlar Federal Savings Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00221
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sampson et al v. Pine State Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00241
Plaintiff: Lee R Sampson and Lakiesha D Sampson
Defendant: Pine State Mortgage Corporation, Pine State Mortgage Corporation, Citimortgage, Inc. and others
Intervenor: Lee Roy Sampson and Lakiesha Danielle Sampson
Johnson-Omeze v. Citimortgage, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00097
Plaintiff: Arnetha Johnson-Omeze
Defendant: Citimortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?