Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Southwest Airlines Co. v. Fjord et al
as 3:2014mc00015
Plaintiff:
Southwest Airlines Co.
Defendant:
Carolyn Fjord , Katherine Arcell , Keith Dean Bradt and others
Nubine v. Dewhurst
as 1:2013mc01095
Respondent:
Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst
Petitioner:
Clyde Nubine
Lillie et al v. Stanford Trust Company, et al
as 3:2013cv03127
Plaintiff:
Troy Lillie , Leah Farr , Kenneth Doughtery and others
Defendant:
Stanford Trust Company, State of Louisiana, Office of Financial Institutions , SEI Investments Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Laird et al v. BP p.l.c., et al
as 4:2012cv00722
Plaintiff:
Clyde Warren Laird and Each of the Individuals Listed on Exhibit A
Defendant:
BP p.l.c.,, BP Exploration and Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Randle v. Midland Funding LLC et al
as 4:2010cv00946
Plaintiff:
Clyde E Randle
Defendant:
Midland Funding LLC and McClesky, Harriger, Brazill & Graf LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Head v. Chesapeake Operating, Inc.
as 4:2010mc00020
Defendant:
Chesapeake Operating, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Head
Head v. Chesapeake Operating, Inc.
as 4:2010xc00020
Defendant:
Chesapeake Operating, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Head
McCoy v. Southwest Credit Systems, LP
as 1:2010cv00745
Plaintiff:
Clyde McCoy
Defendant:
Southwest Credit Systems, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ARC Ridge LLC et al v. United States Army Corp of Engineers et al
as 4:2010cv00541
Plaintiff:
ARC Ridge LLC , Clyde Abernathy , Harold Wise and others
Defendant:
United States Army Corp of Engineers, Stephen L Brooks and Wayne Lea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Scranton v. Weatherford International, Ltd. et al
as 4:2010mc00061
Plaintiff:
Marlo Scranton
Defendant:
Weatherford International, Ltd., Ronnie Singleton, Lisa Castro and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
