Cases 11 - 20 of 569
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ZENGIN v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2024cv02196
Plaintiff:
E.B. ZENGIN
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BELCASTRO et al v. SIMPLEX HOMES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02157
Plaintiff:
VINCENT BELCASTRO and PATRICIA BELCASTRO
Defendant:
SIMPLEX HOMES, INC., GREGORY PETERS, APPLE BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Frazier Industrial Company v. PPT Industrial Machines, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
FRAZIER INDUSTRIAL COMPANY
Defendant:
PPT Industrial Machines, LLC d/b/a Pacific Press Technologies and Right Lane Industries, LLC
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
SIMON v. AIRSTREAM, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY P SIMON
Defendant:
AIRSTREAM, INC. and COLONIAL RV D/B/A COLONIAL AIRSTREAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Default
BERDAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BERDAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
BERDAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BERDAN, SUSAN K. WILSON, JESSICA BRUCKNER and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
