Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 137
PARS EQUALITY CENTER et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv00255
Plaintiff: PARS EQUALITY CENTER, IRANIAN AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL IRANIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL and others
Defendant: TRUMP, DONALD J. TRUMP, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Petitioner: HIAS, NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE, HOWARD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW CIVIL RIGHTS CLINIC and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH, VICTOR WILLIAMS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Xiaoyu Ling v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70362
Petitioner: XIAOYU LING
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Persaud v. Session
as 17-379
Petitioner: Bhisham Persaud, AKA Bhisahm Persaud
Respondent: Dana J. Boente, United States Acting Attorney General
Peng Lin v. Jefferson Session We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-70361
Petitioner: PENG LIN
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Jun Li v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70367
Petitioner: JUN FU LI
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Joaquin Uresty-Garcia v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70364
Petitioner: JOAQUIN URESTY-GARCIA, AKA Cesar Alan, AKA Anastacio Altamirano, AKA Alan Ceazer-Hutron, AKA Cesar Hutron
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Roberto Ramos-Gonzalez v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70353
Petitioner: ROBERTO RAMOS-GONZALEZ
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Yolanda Pereyra-Flores v. Jefferson Session We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-70357
Petitioner: YOLANDA PEREYRA-FLORES
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Rahman v. Session
as 17-369
Petitioner: Masuder Rahman
Respondent: Dana J. Boente
Mirbek Akyev v. Jefferson Session We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-70356
Petitioner: MIRBEK AKYEV
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?