Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Alexander Palomarez v. Darin Young
as 20-3580
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alexander Schroder Palomarez
Respondent / Appellee:
Darin Young, Warden
Chris Miller v. Marty J. Jackley, et al
as 20-3538
Respondent / Appellee:
Marty J. Jackley, Attorney General and Darin Young, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
Chris Allen Miller
Alexander Palomarez v. Darin Young
as 20-3224
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alexander Schroder Palomarez
Respondent / Appellee:
Darin Young, Warden
Lance Owen v. Darin Young
as 20-2722
Respondent:
Darin Young, Warden of the South Dakota State Penitentiary
Petitioner:
Lance George Owen
Kevin Tripp v. Tyler Cook, et al
as 20-2536
Defendant / Appellee:
Savannah Murray, Parole Board Member, in her individual and official capacity, Parole Board, in their individual and official capacity, Darin Young, Warden, in his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Christopher Tripp
Alexander Palomarez v. Darin Young
as 20-2238
Petitioner:
Alexander Schroder Palomarez
Respondent:
Darin Young, Warden
Alexander Palomarez v. Darin Young
as 20-1354
Petitioner:
Alexander Schroder Palomarez
Respondent:
Darin Young, Warden
Christopher Blakney v. Darin Young, Warden, et al
as 20-1330
Respondent / Appellee:
Jason Ravnsborg, Attorney General of the State of South Dakota and Darin Young, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher William Blakney
James Duane Riley v. Darin Young, et al
as 20-1019
Respondent:
Jason Ravnsborg, Attorney General of the State of South Dakota and Darin Young, Warden
Petitioner:
James Duane Riley
Winston Brakeall v. Leidholt, et al
as 19-3566
Defendant / Appellee:
South Dakota Parole Division, Phil Toft, Lt. Chad Rotert, SD DOC employee employed at SDSP, JPA, and/or Unit C in Sioux Falls, South Dakota; in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Winston Grey Brakeall
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
