Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Edward Ray, Jr. v. L. Parreno
as 19-17137
Defendant / Appellee:
L. PARRENO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Edward Ray, Jr. v. E. Lara
as 19-17093
Defendant / Appellee:
E. LARA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Edward Ray, Jr. v. William Sullivan
as 19-72653
Petitioner:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Respondent:
WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, Warden
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Metcalf, et al
as 19-16867
Defendant / Appellee:
METCALF, Correctional Officer, S. DUNAVEN and BOTELLO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 19-15729
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OAKLAND, FRANK ROESCH, ROBERT R. TOY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Shawn Hatton
as 17-71974
Petitioner:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Respondent:
SHAWN HATTON, Warden
Edward Ray, Jr. v. USDC-CAOAK
as 13-71475
:
In re: EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Petitioner:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Edward Ray, Jr. v. USDC-CAOAK
as 12-73008
:
In re: EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Petitioner:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Edward Ray, Jr. v. USDC-CAOAK
as 12-72188
:
In re: EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Petitioner:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Edward Ray, Jr. v. USDC-CASF
as 12-70173
:
In re: EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Petitioner:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
MATTHEW CATE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
