Cases 11 - 20 of 61
EIPCa, et al v. Shirley Weber, et al
as 21-56061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA, INC., JAMES P. BRADLEY, AJA SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY WEBER, California Secretary of State, ROB BONTA, California Attorney General, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California and others
Robert Newell v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 21-55690
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Defendant:
JACKIE LACEY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT H. NEWELL
Robert Newell v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 21-55508
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California and XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Defendant:
JACKIE LACEY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT H. NEWELL
Todd Ashker, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 21-15839
Defendant / Appellant:
GREG LEWIS, Warden, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California, ANTHONY CHAUS, Chief, Office of Correctional Safety, CDCR and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL A. REDD, Jr., GABRIEL RALPH REYES, GEORGE RUIZ and others
Vadim Miesegaes v. Cliff Allenby, et al
as 21-55113
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFF ALLENBY, official capacity as Director of the State Hospital, GARTH PURCELL, in individual capacity, JASON BLACK, in individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VADIM STANLEY MIESEGAES
Harvest Rock Church, Inc., et al v. Gavin Newsom
as 20-56357
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARVEST ROCK CHURCH, INC., itself and on behalf of its member churches in California and HARVEST INTERNATIONAL MINISTRY, INC., itself and on behalf of its member churches in California
Amicus Curiae:
THE BECKET FUND FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY
USA, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 20-56304
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff:
THE GEO GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION
The Geo Group, Inc., et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 20-56172
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California and XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE GEO GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION
USA v. State of California, et al
as 20-16789
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California, MARY D, NICHOLS, Chairman, in her official capacity as Chair of the California Air Resources Board, RICHARD BLOOM, in his official capacity as a board member of the Western Climate Initiative, Inc. and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INTERNATIONAL EMISSIONS TRADING ASSOCIATION and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harvest Rock Church, Inc., et al v. Gavin Newsom
as 20-55907
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARVEST ROCK CHURCH, INC., itself and on behalf of its member churches in California and HARVEST INTERNATIONAL MINISTRY, INC., itself and on behalf of its member churches in California
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, BEND THE ARC: A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE, COVENANT NETWORK OF PRESBYTERIANS, INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, METHODIST FEDERATION FOR SOCIAL ACTION, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF CHRIST IN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
