Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AMODOL et al v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 3:2016cv02367
Plaintiff:
JOSE AMODOL and DENISE AMODOL
Defendant:
HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and AMERICA'S SERVICING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, PENNSYLVANIA v. ICAP PLC et al
as 2:2014cv06427
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
ICAP PLC, ICAP CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
PRUDENTIAL INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS 2 and PRUDENTIAL CORE TAXABLE MONEY MARKET FUND v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2014cv03220
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BARCLAYS BANK PLC and others
Plaintiff:
PRUDENTIAL INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS 2 and PRUDENTIAL CORE TAXABLE MONEY MARKET FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MATTE v. BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA et al
as 2:2014cv02541
Plaintiff:
TRIESTE MATTE
Defendant:
BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, BARCLAYS BANK PLC, DEUTSCHE BANK AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv07608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv07439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv06921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
