Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Haining NewStyle Hairun Acting Agency Co., Ltd. et al v. Jessica Jung
as 2:2020cv10640
Petitioner:
Guizhou NewStyle Media Co., Ltd. and Haining NewStyle Hairun Acting Agency Co., Ltd.
Respondent:
Jessica Jung
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06304
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. Pac. Coast Plumb. Supply Assn et al
as 2:2019mc00084
Defendant:
F. A. Nitchey, A. H. Busch Co., A. R. Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019at00428
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hudson Insurance Company v. Golden State Brokers, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00907
Defendant:
Harav, LLC, Pawar Team, Inc., Steelhead Finance and others
Plaintiff:
Hudson Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Craig Hain v. Conopco, Inc.
as 2:2017cv03656
Defendant:
Conopco, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Craig Hain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Kathleen Elizabeth Haines v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv01810
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Elizabeth Haines
Haines v. Rocket Fuel Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv04473
Defendant:
Rocket Fuel Inc., Monte Zweben, Randolph Wootton, III and others
Plaintiff:
Adryan Haines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howard Kleiman v. Sientra, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv05553
Plaintiff:
Howard Kleiman
Defendant:
Sientra, Inc. , Hani Zeini , Matthew Pigeon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System v. Sientra, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv05549
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System
Defendant:
Sientra, Inc. , Hani Zeini , Matthew Pigeon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
