Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Chew v. MoneyGram International, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv07537
Defendant:
Pamela H. Patsley, W. Alexander Holmes, Lawrence Angelilli and others
Plaintiff:
Khong Meng Chew, Jeffrey Shopoff and Norfolk County Retirement System
Petitioner:
Adrian Marcu, Quang Ho, Sally Guangxia Yu and others
Holmes v. Business Credit Management Associates, Inc.
as 1:2018cv06170
Plaintiff:
Laurie Holmes
Defendant:
BUSINESS CREDIT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Holmes v. Brennan et al
as 1:2017cv00574
Plaintiff:
Wayne A. Holmes
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan and Michelle D. Giles-Polks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
People Of The State Of Illinois v. Holmes et al
as 1:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
People Of The State Of Illinois
Defendant:
Demario Holmes
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lopez v. Richardson et al
as 1:2016cv09670
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez
Defendant:
Gregory A. Richardson, David Roark, Malethea Holmes-Okeawolman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Richland County, South Carolina Sheriff's Dept. et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2015cv50050
Plaintiff:
Richland County, South Carolina Sheriff's Dept. and Leon Lott
Defendant:
United States of America, Ashton Carter and Robin L. Holmes
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
McPeak et al v. Supervalu, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00899
Plaintiff:
Steve McPeak , Katherin Murray , Timothy Roldan and others
Defendant:
Supervalu, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
