Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Anthony Ledea v. Metro-Dade County Police Dept., et al
as 19-11374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY PHILLIP LEDEA
Defendant / Appellee:
JORGE RODRIGUEZ, 01810, ALEXIS RODRIGUEZ, 05990, SUELIN ROMERO, 07825 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-16097
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Objector - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Abdul Mohamed, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 18-16097
Appellant:
STEVEN SIDLER, DANIEL TURNER, HAROLD BROWER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHANNON WISE, RONALD GILLETTE, BRANDON FARMER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07117
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rodriguez v. New York State Department Of Motor Vehicles
as 1:2017cv07118
Defendant:
New York State Department Of Motor Vehicles
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rodriguez v. N.Y.S. DMV Hazmat Unit
as 1:2017cv07115
Defendant:
N.Y.S. DMV Hazmat Unit
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rodriguez v. Kings County Hospital Center
as 1:2017cv07065
Defendant:
Kings County Hospital Center
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rodriguez v. New York State Department Of Motor Vehicles
as 1:2017cv07064
Defendant:
New York State Department Of Motor Vehicles
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rodriguez v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv06942
Defendant:
84th Precinct and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
