Cases 11 - 20 of 29
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2022cv03071
In Re:
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE IN CIVIL MATTERS NO. 41 IN BUENOS AIRES ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF ELIZALDE IRMA RIBEIRO
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF JERUSALEM, ISRAEL IN THE MATTER OF MARLENE LYNN MAZEL HERSKOWITZ V. ELLIOT HERSKOWITZ
as 2:2022cv02043
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
In Re:
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF JERUSALEM, ISRAEL IN THE MATTER OF MARLENE LYNN MAZEL HERSKOWITZ V. ELLIOT HERSKOWITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE TWELFTH FAMILY JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE OF MEXICO CITY, MEXICO IN THE MATTER OF JOSE MERCED GOMEZ OROZCO
as 2:2022cv01558
In Re:
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE TWELFTH FAMILY JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE OF MEXICO CITY, MEXICO IN THE MATTER OF JOSE MERCED GOMEZ OROZCO
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2022cv00940
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
In Re:
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ON LABOR MATTERS NO. 59 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF HERNN DARIO BOZZOLI V. CABLEVISION S.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE 13TH FAMILY COURT OF ISTANBUL, TURKEY IN THE MATTER OF AYKUT CANBILEK V. SEDA ELIF CANBILEK
as 2:2021cv20405
In Re:
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE 13TH FAMILY COURT OF ISTANBUL, TURKEY IN THE MATTER OF AYKUT CANBILEK V. SEDA ELIF CANBILEK
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL CASE NO. ASSISTANCE FROM THE DISTRICT COURT IN ZAMO, POLAND IN THE MATTER OF ANDRZEJ PIOTR DERLUKIEWICZ V. ZOFIA BIELECKA, ET AL
as 2:2021cv20050
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
In Re:
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE DISTRICT COURT IN ZAMOSC, POLAND IN THE MATTER OF ANDRZEJ PIOTR DERLUKIEWICZ V. ZOFIA BIELECKA ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FAMILY COURT IN JERUSALEM, ISRAEL IN THE MATTER OF MARLENE LYNN MAZEL HERSKOWITZ V. ELLIOT HERSKOWITZ
as 2:2021cv20027
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
In Re:
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FAMILY COURT IN JERUSALEM, ISRAEL IN THE MATTER OF MARLENE LYNN MAZEL HERSKOWITZ V. ELLIOT HERSKOWITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL CIVIL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE NO. 9 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF HILDA KARINA GRACIELAZURITAV. FRED EUGENE BADAGNANI
as 2:2021cv11239
In Re:
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL CIVIL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE NO. 9 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF HILDA KARINA GRACIELAZURITAV. FRED EUGENE BADAGNANI
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FAMILY LAW COURT NO. 4 IN SAN ISIDRO, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF CAROLINA NELSON V. MARCELO EMILIO BONELLI
as 2:2020cv20623
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
In Re:
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FAMILY LAW COURT NO. 4 IN SAN ISIDRO, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF CAROLINA NELSON V. MARCELO EMILIO BONELLI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF KARLSRUHE, GERMANY IN THE MATTER OF AYLA TEK V. MICHAEL J. HOUSER
as 2:2020cv08929
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re:
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF KARLSRUHE, GERMANY IN THE MATTER OF AYLA TEK V. MICHAEL J. HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
