Cases 11 - 20 of 408
STILWELL v. DEFENDANT "1" et al.,
as 1:2023cv21920
Defendant:
CHARLES LESLIE STILWELL, DEFENDANT 1 and JOHN DOES 1 - 20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
POLANSKY v. Defendants "1", et al
as 1:2023cv21852
Defendant:
BRUCE JAE POLANSKY, Defendant 1 and JOHN DOES 1 - 20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DUBEY v. DEFENDANT "1" et al.,
as 1:2023cv21840
Plaintiff:
SHIKHA DUBEY
Defendant:
DEFENDANT "1" and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
v. SUN et al
as 1:2023cv21854
Defendant:
DIN YUAN STEVEN SUN, DEFENDANT 1 and JOHN DOES 1- 20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SUN v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 1:2023cv21855
Defendant:
DIN YUAN STEVEN SUN, DEFENDANT 1, JOHN DOES 1 - 20 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wellness Brands, LLC v. Doe 1 et al
as 8:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Wellness Brands, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Petitioner:
GrabAds Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Alexander v. Taylor
as 8:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
THERAN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
BARRY RAY TAYLOR, Frederick J. Britton, Sr., Linda Udovicic and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sawicki v. Loan Depot LLC et al
as 2:2022cv14425
Plaintiff:
Zachary Sawicki
Defendant:
Loan Depot, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
BANDYOPADHYAY v. Defendant 1 et al
as 1:2022cv22907
Defendant:
Defendant 1, SUXIA OBEI, Sasha and others
Plaintiff:
RANGAN BANDYOPADHYAY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
