Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Theodore O'Dell Wilson v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2008cv05268
Respondent:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Does, G. D. Gross and others
Petitioner:
Theodore O'Dell Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eastman v. Marshall
as 2:2004cv04525
Petitioner:
Richard Eastman
Respondent:
John Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Otis Lee Rodgers v. John Marshall
as 5:2008cv01003
Respondent:
John Marshall
Petitioner:
Otis Lee Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alfredo Santana Ortiz v. California State Prison, San Luis Obispo
as 2:2010cv00589
Respondent:
California State Prison, San Luis Obispo and John Marshall
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Santana Ortiz
Norman Lee Brantley v. John Marshall
as 2:2010cv00452
Petitioner:
Norman Lee Brantley
Respondent:
John Marshall
Paul E. Ray v. L. Scott
as 2:2008cv02524
Defendant:
Dr. Faecher, M.D., N Grannis, John Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Delaplane v. John Marshall
as 2:2008cv02306
Petitioner:
Mark Delaplane
Respondent:
John Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bhambra v. True et al
as 3:2009cv05143
Plaintiff:
Harjit Bhambra
Defendant:
John Marshall True, III, Cecilia P. Castellanos and Yolanda Northridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Todd Dana Pike v. John Marshall
as 2:2009cv07531
Petitioner:
Todd Dana Pike
Respondent:
John Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Motion to Extend Time to File
Stephen R. Ryan v. California Men's Colony et al
as 2:2009cv07441
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Ryan
Defendant:
California Men's Colony, John Marshal and The California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.