Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Commodity Futures Trading Comm, et al v. Rust Rare Coin, et al
as 19-4100
Petitioner / Appellant:
TALLY JOHNSON and ANDREW JOHNSON
Receiver:
JONATHAN O. HAFEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION and STATE OF UTAH DIVISION SECURITIES, through Attorney General, Sean D. Reyes
Defendant / Appellee:
DENISE GUNDERSON RUST, GAYLEN DEAN RUST, RUSTY RARE COIN, a Utah corporation and others
Hafen v. Roche
as 2:2019cv00942
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Diane H. Roche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
AAAG California v. Kisana, et al
as 20-4034
Defendant / Appellant:
SPECIALIZED SALES AND LEASING, ABDUL KISANA and LUXURY AUTO GROUP
Receiver:
JONATHAN O. HAFEN
Defendant:
JACK METCALF
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AAAG CALIFORNIA
Hafen v. Percell et al
as 2:2019cv00899
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Vanessa Percell, Charlotte Ann Percell and Rosaria M. Percell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AAAG California v. Kisana, et al
as 20-4018
Defendant / Appellant:
SPECIALIZED SALES AND LEASING, ABDUL KISANA and LUXURY AUTO GROUP
Receiver:
JONATHAN O. HAFEN
Defendant:
JACK METCALF
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AAAG CALIFORNIA
Hafen v. Tea et al
as 2:2019cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
David Tea, Michael Dimick and Rita Tea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Hafen v. Nielson
as 2:2019cv00914
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Gary Nielson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Hafen v. Birge et al
as 2:2019cv00915
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Gordon Gibbs, KH Holdings, Kirk Birge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Hafen v. Aase et al
as 2:2019cv00910
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Andreini, Gene The Estate of, Larry Milligan, Traci Harmond and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0754
Hafen v. Haddock et al
as 2:2019cv00918
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Jair Sanchez, Daniel Haddock, Grant Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
