Cases 11 - 15 of 15
In Re: Combined World Trade
as 12-2998
Plaintiff:
Edgar C. Bayas, Robert Sienkiewicz, Various plaintiffs represented by Cannata/Grochow and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Tier 4 Plaintiffs
Appellant:
WTC Captive Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
100 Church, LLC, Zar Realty Management Corporation, Verizon New York Incorporated and others
In Re: Combined World Trade
as 12-2960
Plaintiff:
Edgar C. Bayas, Robert Sienkiewicz, Various plaintiffs represented by Cannata/Grochow and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Tier 4 Plaintiffs
Defendant:
100 Church, LLC, Zar Realty Management Corporation, Verizon New York Incorporated and others
Cross-Appellant:
Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Incorporated and others
In Re: Combined World Trade
as 12-2964
Plaintiff:
Edgar C. Bayas, Robert Sienkiewicz, Various plaintiffs represented by Cannata/Grochow and others
Defendant:
100 Church, LLC, Zar Realty Management Corporation, Verizon New York Incorporated and others
Cross-Appellant:
Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Incorporated and others
Edgar Bayas v. Zar Realty Management Corp.
as 11-392
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Edgar C. Bayas
Defendant:
Zar Realty Management Corp.,, Verizon New York Inc., Colliers Aba, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. and others
In Re Combined World Trade
as 10-1378
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Edgar C. Bayas
Defendant:
Zar Realty Management Corp.,, Verizon New York Inc., Colliers Aba, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York, Amec Construction Management, Inc., AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
