Other Statutes Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
NEAL v. ASTA FUNDING, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv06981
Plaintiff: DAVID SHAUN NEAL
Defendant: ASTA FUNDING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Tri-US Services, Inc. v. Developers Diversified Realty Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv06734
Plaintiff: Tri-US Services, Inc.
Defendant: DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION, GS II Green Ridge, LLC, Bre DDR Grandville Marketplace, LLC and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION, GS II Green Ridge, LLC, Bre DDR Grandville Marketplace, LLC and others
Thirdparty_defendant: CONTROL BUILDING SERVICES, INC., Control Equity Group Inc., Edward Turen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04392
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01855
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
v. POMPER
as 8:2009mc00097
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, THE v. BURKHART et al
as 2:2008cv04030
Plaintiff: PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, THE
Defendant: CHARLES ANTHONY BURKHART, KOALTON CHASE BURKHART, DEBORAH ANN BRICE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
INSIGNIA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC v. SCHOTTENSTEIN et al
as 3:2007cv04853
Plaintiff: INSIGNIA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC
Defendant: ARYEH M. SCHOTTENSTEIN, SARA SCHOTTENSTEIN, DAVID B. SCHOTTENSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NUTTALL v. DABAH et al
as 2:2007cv00121
Plaintiff: GAIL P. NUTTALL
Defendant: EZRA DABAH, EZRA DABAH, NEAL GOLDBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?