Cases 11 - 20 of 21
(PS) Pardeux v. The US Mendicant Buddhist Congregation et al
as 2:2019cv00881
Defendant:
Thich Giac Chuong, Nhon Trinh, Thich Giac Suong and others
Plaintiff:
Guillaume Pardeux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wang v. Quantenna Communications, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv02511
Defendant:
Mark A. Stevens, Quantenna Communications, Inc., Dr. Sam Heidari and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Clarke v. Quantenna Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02508
Defendant:
Mark A. Stevens, Quantenna Communications, Inc., Jack Lazar and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ProOne, Inc. v. Louie Ned Russell et al
as 8:2018cv01691
Defendant:
Jack Ray Coates and Louie Ned Russell
Plaintiff:
ProOne, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ned Flores v. Access Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv02883
Defendant:
Access Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Ned Flores
Josh Crystal v. Medbox, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00426
Plaintiff:
Josh Crystal and Mike Jones
Defendant:
Medbox, Inc, Medbox, Inc., Pejman Vincent Mehdizadeh and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Peter Phan, Paul Poon, Ervin Gutierrez and others
Petitioner:
Hugo Colindres, Nancy Fox, Michael Konar and others
Ned Flores v. Adir International, LLC
as 2:2015cv00076
Defendant:
Adir International, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ned Flores
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2003cv01676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Kirschenman Enterprises Sales LP et al v. Anshin Produce Co Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01229
Defendant:
Anshin Produce Co Inc, Andy Ortiz, Dennis Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Davalan Sales Inc, GD Fresh Distribution Inc, JHP Produce Inc and others
Ned's House of Produce v. Direct Fresh Produce, Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00863
Plaintiff:
Ned's House of Produce
Defendant:
Direct Fresh Produce, Inc, Alex Garcia, Gisel Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
