Cases 11 - 20 of 218
Application of the New York Times CompanyIn re: Application of the New York Times Company
as 23-5071
In Re:
In re: Application of the New York Times Company and Charlie Savage for Access to Certain Dockets, Orders, Legal Briefing, and Argument Transcripts Ancillary to January 6 Grand Jury Proceedings and Application of Politico and Kyle Cheney to Unseal All Documents Related to the January 6 Grand Jury Investigation
Petitioner:
New York Times Company and Charlie Savage
Petitioner / Appellant:
POLITICO, LLC and Kyle Cheney, Senior Legal Affairs Reporter
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
In re: Press Application for Access to Judicial Records
as 23-5073
In Re:
In re: Press Application for Access to Judicial Records and Proceedings Ancillary to Certain Grand Jury Proceedings Concerning Donald J. Trump and the Trump Organization
Petitioner / Appellant:
Bloomberg L.P., Cable News Network, Inc., The E.W. Scripps Company and others
Petitioner:
CBS Broadcasting, Inc., American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., d/b/a ABC News, The Associated Press and others
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
The New York Times Company et al v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2023cv01854
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company and Charlie Savage
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Office of the Director of National Intelligence and Department of State
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
The New York Times Company et al v. United States Food & Drug Administration
as 1:2023cv00976
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company and Chris Hamby
Defendant:
United States Food & Drug Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
The New York Times Company et al v. Department of Defense
as 1:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company and Mark Walker
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense and Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
The New York Times Company et al v. United States Food & Drug Administration
as 1:2022cv10916
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company and Kate Kelly
Defendant:
United States Food & Drug Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
New York Times Company et al v. U.S. Department of Defense
as 1:2022cv10299
Plaintiff:
New York Times Company and Charlie Savage
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense and U.S. Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
The New York Times Company et al v. United States Department of Defense
as 1:2022cv09481
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company and Azmat Khan
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
The New York Times Company et al v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 1:2022cv09448
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company and Matthieu Aikins
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense and United States Department of State
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
APPLICATION OF THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY AND CHARLIE SAVAGE FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN DOCKETS, ORDERS, LEGAL BRIEFING, AND ARGUMENT TRANSCRIPTS ANCILLARY TO JANUARY 6 GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS
as 1:2022mc00100
In Re:
APPLICATION OF THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY AND CHARLIE DAVAGE FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN DOCKETS, ORDERS, LEGAL BRIEFING, AND ARGUMENT TRANSCRIPTS ANCILLARY TO JANUARY 6 GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS, APPLICATION OF POLITICO AND KYLE CHENEY TO UNSEAL ALL DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE JANUARY 6 GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION and APPLICATION OF THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY AND CHARLIE SAVAGE FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN DOCKETS, ORDERS, LEGAL BRIEFING, AND ARGUMENT TRANSCRIPTS ANCILLARY TO JANUARY 6 GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS
Petitioner:
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, CHARLIE DAVAGE, KYLE CHENEY and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
