Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Soaring Wind Energy LLC et al v. Catic USA Inc et al
as 3:2015cv04032
Plaintiff:
Soaring Wind Energy LLC , Tang Energy Group Ltd , The Nolan Group Inc and others
Defendant:
Catic USA Inc, Aviation Industry Corporation of China, China Aviation Industry General Aircraft Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Soaring Wind Energy LLC et al v. Catic USA Inc et al
as 3:2015cv04033
Plaintiff:
Soaring Wind Energy LLC , Tang Energy Group Ltd , The Nolan Group Inc and others
Defendant:
Catic USA Inc, Aviation Industry Corporation of China, China Aviation Industry General Aircraft Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AVIC International USA Inc et al v. Tang Energy Group LTD et al
as 3:2014cv02815
Plaintiff:
AVIC International USA Inc and Paul Thompson
Defendant:
Tang Energy Group LTD , Keith P Young , Mitchell W Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Crawford v. Van Cleave et al
as 4:2013cv01910
Plaintiff:
Kelly M Crawford
Defendant:
Ralph McLean Van Cleave, Pablo Bonjour, Lady Carlyon Coates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Brannon et al v. BP America Production Company
as 4:2011cv04055
Plaintiff:
Kevin D Brannon , Russell D Brannon , Duoc Chau and others
Defendant:
BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1333
Renabato v. Compass Bancshares Inc. DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:11-CV-111. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:07-CV-46
as 4:2011cv00111
Defendant:
Compass Bancshares Inc
Plaintiff:
Jay Nolan Renabato
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Renobato v. Compass Bank Corporation
as 4:2007cv00046
Plaintiff:
Jay Nolan Renobato
Defendant:
Compass Bank Corporation and Compass Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
