Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Rickey White v. Scott Crew
as 21-70537
Respondent:
SCOTT CREW, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
RICKEY WHITE
McCleary v. Core Civic, et al
as 21-7001
Defendant / Appellee:
DIANA JONES, Trust fund accounts, MS. LINDSAY, RAY LARIMER, Health Services Chief and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELO VERNON MCCLEARY
Thomas v. Stitt, et al
as 21-6011
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN BICKLEY, Executive Director of the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, SCOTT CROW, Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, T. HASTINGS SIEGFRIED, Chair of the Oklahoma Board of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWAIN EDWARD THOMAS
Green v. Doe, et al
as 21-6004
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, individually in his official capacity as interim Sheriff of the Cleveland County Detention Center, JOEL BRENT, in his official capacity as Chief Medical Officer of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-20, individually and in their official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKKE LEON GREEN
Buchanan v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 21-6003
Respondent / Appellee:
COUNTY OF OKLAHOMA, OKLAHOMA PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD, OKLAHOMA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK W. BUCHANAN
Parker v. Crow
as 20-5117
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALVIN PARKER
Parker v. Crow
as 20-5107
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALVIN PARKER
Bowens v. Crow
as 20-6172
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRISTIAN DON BOWENS
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, Director of Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Bowens v. Crow
as 20-6157
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRISTIAN DON BOWENS
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, Director of Oklahoma Department of Corrections
In re: Draper
as 20-6122
Petitioner:
In re: ERNEST DRAPER
Respondent:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
