Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Anthony Wright v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 20-16275
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE, JEFFREY ALVAREZ, RICHARD A,. BAILEY and others
Defendant:
CLINT HICKMAN, JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, STEVE THUCRI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY JEROME WRIGHT
Phillip Camillo-Amisano v. BOP, et al
as 20-55038
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE LANGFORD, Warden, FCC Lompoc, ALVAREZ, Lieutenant, individual, WILLIAM WATSON, M.D., individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP CAMILLO-AMISANO
Jordan Venable v. Maricopa County Justice Courts, et al
as 19-17589
Defendant / Appellee:
DREAMY DRAW JUSTICE COURT, MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN JUSTICE COURT, MARICOPA COUNTY JUSTICE COURTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN DUKE VENABLE
Jordan Venable v. Glendale Police Department, et al
as 19-17594
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN DUKE VENABLE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, Unknown Officers and GLENDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Josh Albritton v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 19-17205
Defendant / Appellee:
COCHISE COUNTY, JAMES CONLOGUE, PIMA COUNTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSH ALBRITTON
CIT Bank, N.A. v. Estate of Shari S. Marrazzo et al
as 3:2017cv01948
Defendant:
All Other Persons or Parties Unknown Claiming any Right, Ttitle, Lein, or Interst in the Real Poperty Known as 3435 SW Columbia Dr, Madras, OR 97741, Estate of Shari S. Marrazzo, Andrea L. Ryun and others
Counter Defendant:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Unknown:
Katie Riggs
Cross Defendant:
Estate of Shari S. Marrazzo
Counter Claimant:
Edward Hernandez
Claimant:
Edward Hernandez
Cross Claimant:
Edward Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation
Duncan Robertson v. USDC-WAWSE
as 13-72384
:
In re: DUNCAN K. ROBERTSON
Petitioner:
DUNCAN K. ROBERTSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest:
GMAC MORTGAGE LLC, EXECUTIVE TRUSTEE SERVICES LLC, RESIDENTIAL FUNDING REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
