Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Washington State, et al v. Chimei Innolux Corp., et al
as 11-80051
Plaintiff - Respondent: WASHINGTON STATE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in the state, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant - Petitioner: CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., CMO JAPAN CO., LTD. and others
The People of the State of California et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv05212
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chimei Innolux Corp. and others
Plaintiff: The People of the State of California , The State of California , Alameda County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Calhoun v. San Diego County and All of Its Corrupt Partners et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv01409
Plaintiff: Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant: San Diego County and All of Its Corrupt Partners, W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr, VAMC San Diego and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Abramsky, et al v. Alstom SA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2003cv06595
Plaintiff: Michael Abramsky
Defendant: Alstom SA , Pierre Bilger , Patrick Kron and others
Consolidated_plaintiff: Rosenbaum Partners, L.P. , Claude M. Shelby , Rahmi Soyugenc and others
Movant: Bruce Morris, The State Universities Retirement System of Illinois, West Virginia Investment Management Board and others
Consolidated_defendant: Francois Newey , James Milner , William Purves and others
Trustee: San Diego City Employees' Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Corelleone v. State of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv02094
Plaintiff: Achilles D Corelleone
Defendant: State of California, San Diego City of, San Diego County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SW Center Biological, et al v. Bldg Industry, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-56851
Plaintiff - Appellee: SOUTHWEST CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, WETLANDS ACTION NETWORK and others
Defendant: KEN BERG, Carlsbad Field Supervisor, ANNE BADGLEY, Acting Regional Director, GALE A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior and others
Defendant-cross-defendant - Appellee: CITY OF SAN DIEGO
Defendant-intervenor: PARDEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant: BUILDING INDUSTRY LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS, CALIFORNIA BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION and others
In Re: WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2002cv03288
Consolidated Plaintiff: Sam P. Seay, State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, Jere L. Beasley and others
Consolidated Defendant: Bank of America Securities LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Group and others
Petitioner: Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of operating Engineers-Employers Construction Retirement Trust, The National Asbestos Workers Pension Fund, State of Alaska Department of Revenue and others
Plaintiff: Plumbers & Steamfitters Local 577 Pension Fund, Wayne L. Matthews, George T. Flyny and others
Intervenor Defendant: Jack Grubman, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Limited
Claimant: Paul G. Rochmis, UBS Financial Services Inc., Holly M. Haik and others
Appellant: Terry Neal, Teresa O. Moxley, Retirement Systems of Alabama and others
Defendant: Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Worldcom, Inc., ABN Amro Incorporated and others
Lead Plaintiff: New York State Common Retirement Fund, HGK Asset Management, H. Carl McCall and others
Respondent: Roslyn Berger
Not Classified By Court: Jane B. Selfe, James J. Savage, Cynthia R. Levin Moulton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?