Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Reisbick v. QTS Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06350
Plaintiff:
Spencer Reisbick
Defendant:
QTS Realty Trust, Inc., Chad Williams, Philip P. Trahanas and others
Stein v. QTS Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05927
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
QTS Realty Trust, Inc., Chad Williams, Philip P. Trahanas and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman, Spencer Reisbick and Fred Hardwick
Owens v. Preska
as 1:2021cv05210
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Spencer Owens
Defendant:
Loretta A. Preska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alexander et al v. Habib Bank Limited
as 1:2021cv02351
Plaintiff:
Hannah Mason, Kathleen Lynn Alexander, Holly Lau Abraham and others
Defendant:
Habib Bank Limited
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Feldman et al v. Strulovitch et al
as 1:2020cv07270
Defendant:
FIRST AVENUE REALTY HOLDINGS L.P.,, 1078 DEKALB LLC, CS YH CONDOS LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHLOMO KORITZ, YECHIEL SHUKRON, RAPHAEL BITAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Spencer v. Noble Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv06801
Defendant:
Martha B. Wyrsch, Barbara J. Duganier, Scott D. Urban and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Spencer
Spencer v. KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05497
Defendant:
KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc., Stephen M. Ward, Jr., Richard G. Hamermesh and others
Plaintiff:
Claudette Spencer
Poole et al v. Bendixen et al
as 6:2020cv00697
Defendant:
Thomas Oelrichs, Jeff Raney, Randy Mooney and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 7, Charles C. Manner, John Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lee v. The Meet Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03850
Defendant:
Geoffrey Cook, Christopher Fralic, Bedi Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee
Miles v. The Meet Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03301
Defendant:
Christopher Fralic, Ajay Singh, The Meet Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charmaine Miles
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
