Cases 11 - 20 of 2,791
Rodriguez v. Martinez, et al.
as 24-3284
Petitioner:
PEDRO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
KELLY MARTINEZ, San Diego Sheriff and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TruConnect Communication, Inc. v. Peterson
as 24-3297
Plaintiff:
TRUCONNECT COMMUNICATION, INC., a California corporation
Defendant:
RACHEL PETERSON, n her official capacity as Executive Director of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California and in her individual capacity
Weems v. Burton, et al.
as 24-3179
Petitioner:
ZIR ION WEEMS
Respondent:
ROBERT BURTON and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Feather River Air Quality Mgt. District v. USPS Marysville Post Office et al
as 2:2024cv01406
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California ex rel. Feather River Air Quality Management District
Defendant:
United States Postal Service Marysville Post Office and Postmaster Fred Stewart
Few v. San Jose Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv03832
Plaintiff:
Jenessia Few
Defendant:
San Jose Police Dept., Cynthia Beltran-Hahn, Trent Tessler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
People of the State of California v. Salas et al
as 3:2024mc80105
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California
Defendant:
Andres Campos Salas and Raymond Araujo
Not Yet Classified:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Vitale v. State of California Franchise Tax Board, et al.
as 24-2906
Plaintiff:
FRANCESCO VITALE
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD and DAVID A. HUBBERT, Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Sanchez v. St. Andre, et al.
as 24-2914
Petitioner:
FERNANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
ROB ST. ANDRE and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Smith v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-2790
Petitioner:
RONALD J. SMITH
Respondent:
MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
Thomas v. County of Riverside, et al.
as 24-2810
Plaintiff:
CRAIG A. THOMAS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
