Cases 11 - 20 of 86
United States of America v. Torres-Colon
as 3:2018cv01013
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rolando Torres-Colon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
In Re: Enforcement of Subpoena
as 3:2017mc00042
Petitioner:
NIPRO Medical Corporation
Respondent:
Mariel Bermudez-Torres
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Petition for Review of Results of Bar Examination
as 3:2017mc00017
Petitioner:
Petition for Review of Results of Bar Examination, Frances Lange-Torres and Glenda L. Alicea-Parrilla
Scotiabank de Puerto Rico v. Garcia-Padilla et al
as 3:2016cv02736
Plaintiff:
Scotiabank de Puerto Rico and The Bank of Nova Scotia
Defendant:
Alejandro Garcia-Padilla, Juan C. Zaragoza-Gomez, Luis G. Cruz-Batista and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera-Colon v. Torres-Diaz et al
as 3:2016cv02045
Plaintiff:
Nestor Rivera-Colon
Defendant:
Miguel E. Torres-Diaz, William Miranda-Torres, Highway and Transportation Authority of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Torres-Matos et al v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015mc00574
Plaintiff:
Ana Victoria Torres-Matos, Joel Marin-Bonilla, Luis Rodriguez-Otero and others
Defendant:
Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc. and Gamo Outdoor, S.L.
Sanchez-Castro v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv03075
Plaintiff:
Jose C. Sanchez-Castro
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Doral Bank, Vazquez & Vizcarrondo LLP and others
Receiver:
United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PPV Entertainment, LLC. v. Rivera Torres
as 3:2015cv02921
Plaintiff:
PPV Entertainment, LLC.
Defendant:
Victor M. Rivera Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
