Cases 11 - 20 of 202
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bayani v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Eman Bayani
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Port of Vancouver USA v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2023cv05109
Plaintiff:
Port of Vancouver USA
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to Confirm Arbitration
Bennett et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2022cv01805
Plaintiff:
Tara Bennett, David Garcia and Edward Polhill
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Kent School District v. JUUL Labs Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
Kent School District
Defendant:
JUUL Labs Inc, Altria Group Inc, Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tulalip Tribes v. JUUL Labs Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00944
Plaintiff:
Tulalip Tribes
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. Bimbo Bakeries USA Inc
as 2:2021cv01673
Plaintiff:
Puget Soundkeeper Alliance
Defendant:
Bimbo Bakeries USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Litwin v. Sievert et al
as 2:2021cv01599
Plaintiff:
Harold Litwin
Defendant:
G. Michael Sievert, Timotheus Hottges, Marcelo Claure and others
Nominal Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
