Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Cheryl & Co. v. Krueger et al
as 2:2018cv01485
Defendant:
Amy Coley, Cheryl L. Krueger, T. David Adell and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl & Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In re: Amy Sue Thomas
as 2:2018mc00024
Respondent:
Amy Sue Thomas
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Primus v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission Agency (Akron) et al
as 5:2018cv00129
Plaintiff:
Sharyll Primus
Defendant:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission Agency (Akron), Tameka Brooks, Brad Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cunningham v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission et al
as 5:2018cv00132
Plaintiff:
Paul Cunningham
Defendant:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission, Tameka Brooks, Brad Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Urban et al v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission of the United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv01005
Plaintiff:
Laura D. Urban , Jonathan Strong , Constance Jane Carl and others
Defendant:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission of the United States of America , Cheryl A. LaFleur , Colette D. Honorable and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Dawson et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 5:2015cv01920
Plaintiff:
David D. Dawson and Amy B Dawson
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Logan v. Receivable Management Services Corp et al
as 3:2015cv01787
Plaintiff:
Amy M Logan
Defendant:
Receivable Management Services Corp. and Shelly James
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Zuelsdorf et al v. Oiler et al
as 2:2014mc00015
Petitioner:
Amy Zuelsdorf and Bobbi Jo Cook
Respondent:
Wanda Oiler and Tod Hagins, M.D.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
