Cases 21 - 30 of 24,366
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. TARAKHCHYAN, D.C. et al
as 3:2024cv06952
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
SAKO TARAKHCHYAN, D.C., PARKWAY AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER, LLC, SHAHID MIAN, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GREENE COUNTY, TENNESSEE v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv06919
Plaintiff:
Greene County, Tennessee
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC, NOVO NORDISK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BLAZOVIC v. KEYSTONE SERVICING COMPANY, LLC
as 3:2024cv06893
Plaintiff:
HELENA BLAZOVIC
Defendant:
KEYSTONE SERVICING COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
STILLWELL & GLADDING INC. v. GILMAN et al
as 3:2024cv06819
Plaintiff:
STILLWELL & GLADDING INC.
Defendant:
WILLIAM S. GILMAN and TRUTEK CORP.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mintz et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
as 1:2024cv06854
Plaintiff:
Hal Mintz and SABBY MANAGEMENT, LLC
Defendant:
U.S SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
ROTHMAN v. SN SERVICING CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv22431
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. APPLE CORING & CUTTING CORP.
as 2:2024cv06753
Petitioner:
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, P.C.
Respondent:
APPLE CORING & CUTTING CORP.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
