Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 34
In re: Tormu E. Prall, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2870
Petitioner: In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: GARY M. LANIGAN and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Nominal Respondent: ANNE E. THOMPSON
In Re: Tormu Prall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2074
Petitioner: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Nominal Respondent: JEROME B. SIMANDLE
In re: Bienvenido Casilla
as 13-4362
Petitioner: In re: BIENVENIDO CASILLA
Respondent: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GARY M. LANIGAN, Commissioner of Corrections and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
In Re: Tormu Prall, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2459
Petitioner: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GARY M. LANIGAN
In Re: Tormu E. Prall, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3947
Petitioner: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT and others
In re: Michael Janowski, et al
as 12-3949
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL S. JANOWSKI
Defendant - Respondent: WILLIAMS, MICHAEL FERLISE, NURSE DAVID and others
In Re: Tormu Prall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2478
Petitioner: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORR and GARY M. LANIGAN
In Re: Tormu Prall, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1046
Petitioner: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: GARY M. LANIGAN and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORR
In re: David Womack
as 11-2840
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: DAVID LEE WOMACK
Defendant: W. J. MOLEINS, CHRISTOPHER HOLMES, JAMES DRUMM and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: ANNE E THOMPSON and JOEL A. PISANO
Mona M. Lanigan v. 3m, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-81810
Plaintiff: Mona M. Lanigan
Defendant: 3m

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?