Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Richardson et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
David B Richardson and Law Offices of David B. Richardson, P.S.
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burr v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Burr
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2016cv05040
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Burr
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2015cv05546
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Advance Ross Corp , BNSF Railway Company, bp product north america, inc. and atlantic richfield company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
United States of America et al v. Advance Ross Sub Co et al
as 3:2015cv05548
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Washington , Puyallup Tribe of Indians and others
Defendant:
Advance Ross Sub Co, BNSF Railway Company, BP Products North America Inc and Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Microsoft Mobile Inc. et al v. LG Chem America Inc et al
as 2:2015cv01038
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Mobile Inc. and Microsoft Mobile Oy
Defendant:
LG Chem America Inc, LG Chem Ltd, Panasonic Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Air Transport Association of America, Inc. et al v. Port of Seattle et al
as 2:2014cv01733
Plaintiff:
Air Transport Association of America Inc and Baggage Airline Guest Services Inc
Defendant:
Port of Seattle and Mark M Reis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Lafarge North America Inc
as 2:2014cv01454
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lafarge North America Inc
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
In re Application of Google Inc
as 2:2014cv00400
Respondent:
HTC America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
