Cases 21 - 27 of 27
City of Omaha Police and Fire Retirement System v. The Timberland Company et al
as 1:2011cv00277
Plaintiff:
City of Omaha Police and Fire Retirement System
Defendant:
Jeffrey B. Swartz and The Timberland Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Farrelly v. Concord, City of et al
as 1:2010cv00583
Defendant:
Walter Carroll, Concord, City of and Eric J. Pichler
Plaintiff:
John Farrelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Portsmouth, NH, City of
as 1:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Portsmouth, NH, City of
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
USA v. Lebanon, City of
as 1:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Lebanon, City of
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
State of New Hampshire v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00080
Plaintiff:
State of New Hampshire
Defendant:
ExxonMobil Corporation, Cumberland Farms, Inc., FirstGroup America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land (CERCLA)
USA et al v. ExxonMobil Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00060
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
ExxonMobil Corporation, Cumberland Farms, Inc., FirstGroup America, Inc. and others
Consol Defendant:
US Postal Service, US Federal Aviation Administration, US Department of the Navy and others
Consol Plaintiff:
State of New Hampshire
Intervenor:
Brodie Ski Mountain Area, Inc., Brodie Ski Mountain Area, Inc., J.W. Kelly's Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Nashua, City of et al
as 1:2007cv00046
Plaintiff:
Omnipoint Communications, Inc. and Omnipoint Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Nashua, City of and Nashua, City of, Zoning Board of Adjustment
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
