Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Nazanin Kazerooni v. CVS Pharmacy Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00114
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Nazanin Kazerooni
Kayla Reed v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv03877
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Kayla Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
United States of America et al v. Walgreen Company et al
as 2:2009cv01293
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Walgreen Company
Plaintiff:
California, Jack Chin, Delaware and others
Intervenor:
State Of California
213) 894-7819 (fax:
U.S. DOJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Sheila A. Blowers v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv08382
Plaintiff:
Sheila A. Blowers
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc and Does
Alexander Forouzesh v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc et al
as 2:2017cv08375
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Alexander Forouzesh
Kristina Ratliff v. CVS Pharmacy Inc et al
as 8:2017cv01969
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Kristina Ratliff
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC et al
as 3:2017cv02154
Plaintiff:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
Bumble Bee Foods, LLC, Starkist Company, Dongwon Industries, Co. LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Yurie Hewitt v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00843
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Yurie Hewitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Edna Porter et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv05806
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Edna Porter and Shepard Porter
Stephanie Patton et al v. Forest Laboratories, LLC
as 5:2017cv00922
Defendant:
Actavis, PLC., Allergan, Inc., Allergan, PLC. and others
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Knighten and Stephanie Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
